Legends Trading Inactivity Rule
The Simple Answer
No explicit inactivity or dormancy rule, such as a stated number of days without a trade before account closure, was found on Legends Trading’s accessible official pages, though the firm’s Knowledge Base, the most likely location for this policy, returned a Cloudflare bot-detection challenge on every fetch attempt.
This finding is based on a review of Legends Trading’s homepage, Plans page, and About page.
What We Know and What Needs Confirmation
No Rule Found on Accessible Pages
No explicit inactivity or dormancy rule, meaning a stated number of days without a trade before account closure, was found anywhere on Legends Trading’s accessible official pages: the homepage, Plans page, and About page.
The Knowledge Base Was Inaccessible
The Knowledge Base, which is the most likely location for this policy, returned a Cloudflare bot-detection challenge page on every fetch attempt and was not accessed during this research pass. This should be treated as an unconfirmed gap, not a confirmed absence of the rule.
Final Thoughts
Because Legends Trading’s Knowledge Base could not be accessed due to bot-detection, the absence of a found inactivity rule should not be read as confirmation that no such rule exists.
Compare rules, pricing and live discounts across every prop firm in one place.
FAQ
Does Legends Trading have an inactivity rule?
No explicit rule was found on the accessible official pages, but the Knowledge Base could not be reached to fully confirm.
Why couldn’t Legends Trading’s Knowledge Base be accessed?
It returned a Cloudflare bot-detection challenge page on every fetch attempt.
Is the absence of a found inactivity rule confirmation that none exists for Legends Trading?
No, this should be treated as an unconfirmed gap, not a confirmed absence.
Which Legends Trading pages were reviewed for this research?
The homepage, Plans page, and About page.
How can I confirm Legends Trading’s inactivity policy?
Contact Legends Trading support directly since the Knowledge Base was inaccessible.